Chief
Justice of Karnataka High Court D.H. Waghela on Tuesday recused himself from hearing
DMK leader Anbazhagan's appeal challenging the appointment of G Bhavani Singh,
special public prosecutor (SPP) in the appeal filed by AIADMK general secretary
Jayalalithaa against her conviction in the disproportionate assets case.
Mr. G. Bhavani Singh, SPP in the disproportionate assets case |
The
single Judge, Justice Byrareddy had directed Anbazhagan and Karnataka
government to approach the Supreme Court for clarification on the issue of
procedure of the appointment of the SPP as it was improper for him to interpret
its order relating to the bail plea filed by Jayalalithaa.
On
October 17 last year, the apex court had granted conditional bail to
Jayalalithaa, who was convicted in the ‘disproportionate assets case’ and
sentenced to imprisonment for a term of four years by the trial court on September
27, 2014 , saying that the hearing on her appeal against conviction in the High
Court should be completed in three months from December 18.
Justice
Byrareddy had also observed that since the apex court in its order on giving
bail to Jayalalithaa was silent on the issue of procedure of appointing the
SPP, the High Court wouldn't like to interpret the apex court's order.
The
appeal filed by Mr. Anbazhagan was being heard by a Division bench comprising
of Chief Justice Waghela and Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri from yesterday.
The
recusal came was after Mr. Singh's counsel said that the Chief Should not hear
the case as he (Chief Justice Waghela) had on the administrative side had on
earlier occasion given consent to Karnataka government's decision of removing
Mr. Singh from the post of SPP. Later this decision of the Karnataka government
was set aside by the Apex Court.
Mr.
Singh's counsel had filed a memo for recusal of the Chief Justice in the
morning and recthe Chief Justice recused from hearing in the afternoon when Mr.
Singh's counsel insisted that the Chief Justice should not hear the appeal by
Mr. Anbazhagan whereas counsel representing other parties said that they have
no object for Chief Justice from hearing the appeal.
No comments:
Post a Comment