Is a married woman
in a joint Hindu family entitled to maintenance from her father-in-law in case
her husband has failed to maintain her owing to his becoming incapacitated due
to physical disability or mental disorder?
This was the puzzling
legal question which arose for consideration before the Punjab and Haryana High
Court in February 2014 during the hearing of a case, which led to its directing
the Law Commission of India to prepare a report on the interesting issue which
has manifold implications.
It is now learnt
that the Law Commission of India has prepared a report on this grey area in the
existing law.
Justice A.P. Shah, Chairman, Law Commission of India |
The Commission is
likely to submit its report to the Union Law & Justice ministry next week on
the issue and recommend an appropriate amendment to the Hindu Adoption and
Maintenance Act (HAMA) 1956 to recognize the claim of the daughter-in-law to
claim maintenance from the father-in-law as the head of the Hindu Undivided
Family (HUF), if her husband is incapacitated due to disability which prevents
him from maintaining her.
Last February, when
dealing with a case – Avtar Singh vs
Jasbir Singh – the Punjab and Haryana High Court had taken note of the
legal obligation of the father-in-law to provide maintenance to the
daughter-in-law in case of the son's disability.
In its judgment the
High Court had said: "The law is
silent on whether a daughter-in-law, who does not have any source of
maintenance, can claim maintenance if her husband is insane or of unsound mind.
When she has to maintain her mentally-ill husband, her condition is worse than
being a widowed daughter-in-law. In such a situation, the wife should be deemed
to be dependent on the father-in-law and entitled to maintenance as provided under
section 19 of the HAM Act."
The High Court was
hearing the plea of a woman, whose husband was of unsound mind, seeking share
of the HUF property for her maintenance. Although through a Panchayat
settlement she had been given her share, subsequently her father-in-law had
dispossessed her of the property.
No comments:
Post a Comment